Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 08:39
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
"Can't Believe Virat Kohli Knew...": RCB's Celebrations Amid Stampede Row Heats Up - NDTV Sports
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Is it common for girlfriends to have close male friends who are single and not related to them?
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
U.S. growth forecast cut sharply by OECD as Trump tariffs sour global outlook - CNBC
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What's the biggest myth about illegal immigrants?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Watch These Intel Price Levels After Stock Surged 8% Tuesday to Lead S&P 500 Gainers - Investopedia